Showing posts with label Surgical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Surgical. Show all posts

Monday, November 26, 2018

Emergency Surgical Airway

Emergency Surgical Airway almost always happens in a midst of chaos since this is a rarely performed procedure. Regardless, regular simulation sessions and mental rehearsal can help us be more familiar with this and make this less stressful. 

Nomenclature
Surgical cricothyrotomy
Incision in the cricothyroid membrane and an airway (tracheostomy tube or ET tube) is placed to ventilate the patient. 

Needle cricothyrotomy
Insertion of a catheter via percutaneous needle puncture of the cricothyroid membrane to allow percutaneous translaryngeal ventilation (PTLV)

Tracheostomy
Incision is made between two of the tracheal rings


Relevant Anatomy
Cricothyroid membrane (CTM) is an elastic membrane located anteriorly and midline in the neck. 





Borders of CTM
Superior - Thyroid Cartilage (Note - Superior to the thyroid cartilage is thyrohyoid membrane connecting it to the hyoid bone)
Inferior - Cricoid Cartilage and Thyroid Gland
Lateral - Cricothyroid muscles and Blood vessels



The cricoid cartilage forms the inferior border of the CTM and is the only completely circumferential cartilaginous structure of the larynx. Also nothe that the cricothyroid arteries branch from the superior thyroid arteries and may form a small anastomotic arch traversing the superior aspect of the cricothyroid membrane. 


Indications
Inability to maintain >90% SpO2 between intubation attempts or after 3 attempts
Inability to BMV between intubation attempts or after 3 attempts
Multiple Failed Endotracheal Intubation attempts

Contraindications 
Obstruction below CTM, Tracheal fracture/transection
Age yonger than 12 years (some texts mention 5 years)


How to find the CTM

  • Located between Cricoid Cratilage and Thyroid Cartilage
  • If obscured by short neck/swelling, estimated locaton is at about 2 to 3 cm inferior to the laryngeal prominence or four fingerbreadths above the sternal notch.



Criciothroidotomy is a tactile procedure i.e you dont need to know where exactly the membrane is located before you make the skin incision if you use a 2 incision technique. 


Techniques

  • 2 incision (Vertical then Horizontal Technique)
  • 1 incision (Horizontal only over CTM)
Equipment
  • Size 11 Scalpel
  • Finger
  • Bougie
  • Tube 6' ETT


Surgical Cric Videos 









Common Complications
  • Bleeding 
  • Tube Malposition
More on Cric and Surgical Airway by Rich Levitan (Laryngeal Handshake and Sternal Stabilisation)


Posted by:


              
     Lakshay Chanana
     
     ST4 Trainee
     Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
     Department of Emergency Medicine
     Edinburgh
     Scotland

     @EMDidactic

Monday, October 15, 2018

Can we rule out appendicitis with a low ALVARADO score?

Abdominal pain is a common ED presentation and one of the top differential for RLQ pain is Acute Appendicitis. Early in the course, examination findings are often subtle and bloods may not show a raised WCC or CRP. One way to further risk stratify patients is by using 
the Alvarado score or the Modified Alvarado Score.


The original Alvarado score was on a 10 point scale. It has been modified to exclude criteria of a left shift. The sensitivity of the Alvarado score is about 72% and the specificity is 54% and like any other decision rule, this is not flawless. Relying solely on the score may miss about a third of patients with Appendicitis. Since multiple organ systems are represented in the abdomen, it is hard to create a clinical decision rule which can precisely identify the diagnosis. 

Additionally, using this score in females can be tricky due to possible OBGYN pathologies. 






Bottomline
  • Use your clinical acumen and utilize Alvarado score only as an adjunct.
  • Use Alvarado Score as more of a "rule-in' test, not "rule-out" test. 
  • It is worth doing and documenting serial abdomen exams in non-specific abdo pains. d/w Surgical in-patient teams for possible admission for observation rather than directly jumping to imaging. 
  • If discharging, give strong worsening statements and explain uncertainty about the diagnosis and need for review if symptoms change. 


References
  1. Meltzer AC, Baumann BM, Chen EH, Shofer FS, Mills AM. Poor sensitivity of a modified Alvarado score in adults with suspected appendicitis. Annals of emergency medicine. 2013 Aug 1;62(2):126-31.
  2. Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC medicine. 2011 Dec;9(1):139.

Posted by:

              
     Lakshay Chanana
     
     ST4 Trainee
     Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
     Department of Emergency Medicine
     Edinburgh
     Scotland

     @EMDidactic




Monday, December 4, 2017

Acute Abdomen in Elderly


Working up an elderly population presenting with abdominal pain is always a challenging task. Almost always there are chances of potential mishaps due to delayed or missed diagnosis. Data suggests that abdominal pain is the most common ED presentation and the fourth most common complaint among elderly and nearly half of elderly patients with abdominal pain will require admission, and 1/3 will require  a surgical intervention. This makes it an important topic for us to be familiar with. Usual issues related to geriatric population (pharmacologic, social, cognitive) make evaluation extremely difficult. Click here to read more about how is elderly population different.
 

Key Issues:


  • Present later in their disease course
  • Present with vague symptoms (Only 1/6 present with textbook appendicitis presentation)
  • Difficult Communication (hearing, visual, cognitive)
  • Underreport symptoms (Poor pain perception, fear of hospitals and medical interventions)
  • Physical exam has limited utility - Atrophy of abdominal wall musculature diminishes rebound and guarding
  • Medications blunt or alter their response to disease
  • Less likely to develop fever or leukocytosis
In A&E, we should have a low threshold to image elderly due to high likelihood of surgical illness and unreliable physical examination. Ideally, CT is the imaging of choice. Plain films are of limited utility. Due to unreliable history, misleading examination findings and unpredictable nature and course of the illness, admission for observation should be considered if no confusion is reached after ED work up. . 

Common Geriatric Abdomen Pathologies

Mesenteric Ischemia
  • Risk factors include Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure. 
  • Pain out of proportion to examination. Perform a quick assessment and come up with a plan. Involve your Surgical colleagues and Radiologists ASAP.
  • May present with normal vital signs and laboratory values. Do not overly on White cell count and lactate. Lactate and EBC both are non-specific. 
  • Imaging of choice is CT with IV contrast.
  •  Rx them with Pain Relief, Fluids and electrolytes, NG Tube for gut decompression, Foleys Catheterisation , Broad Spectrum Antibiotics and immediate surgical consultation. 



Aortic Diseases (AAA, Dissection)

  • Be cautious whenever you attribute flank/abdo pain to Renal Stones in elderly.
  • AAA May present with weakness, dizziness, uneasiness or syncope
  • Classic presentation is pain abdomen, pulsalitle mass and hypotension
  • Use bedside USG to measure aorta and also look for a dissecting flap
  • Maintain BP enough to perfuse brain and do not give too much fluids
  • Arrange blood for transfusion and involve vascular surgeons ASAP


Gall Bladder Disease and Pacreatitis


  • Perforation, gangrene, emphysematous cholecystitis, ascending cholangitis, gallstone ileus, choledocholiathisis, and gallstone-induced pancreatitis are all more prevalent 
  • More than 50% with acute cholecystitis will lack nausea, vomiting, or fever. Leukocytosis may be absent in 30% to 40% of those with acute cholecystitis.31 Evaluation by ultrasound may be less helpful given the increased prevalence of acalculous cholecystitis as well as cholodocolithiasis and delay in surgery may result in an increased mortality.
  • More than 50% cases pancreatitis and elderly are due to Gall Stones. 


Small Bowel Obstruction


  • Classical symptoms are not seen early in the course of disease
  • May present with diarrhoea due to hyperperistalsis distal to the obstruction point
  • Gallstone disease may contribute to 25% of bowel obstructions in elderly


Diverticulitis


  • Diverticular bleeding is one of the most common causes of lower GI bleeds
  • Acute diverticulitis occurs when the diverticula become obstructed by fecal matter, resulting in lymphatic obstruction, inflammation, and perforation. 
  • Usually presents with LLQ pain, with or without bloody stools, nausea, and fever but 1/3rd of the geriatric presentations of acute diverticulitis do not have abdominal tenderness on examination. Once the acute phase resolves, endoscopy should be performed to rule out carcinoma after an acute episode of diverticulitis. 
  • Most can be managed medically, with antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and bowel rest. If there are larger perforations or abscess formation, surgery or percutaneous drainage may be indicated.

Large Bowel Obstruction

  • Common causes are diverticulosis and malignancy. 
  • Classically present with abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation/obstipation, 
  • Often diagnosed late in their course 
  • Sigmoid and cecal volvulus account for a smaller subset of large-bowel obstructions, but more often requires emergent surgical intervention. 
  • Sigmoid volvulus, causing close to 80% of volvuli, causes a more gradual onset of pain, whereas cecal volvulus presents more acutely.
  • Sigmoid volvulus can often be decompressed with a rectal tube, sigmoidoscope, or barium enema, whereas cecal volvulus requires surgical repair. Volvulus of either site is at risk for perforation and should be decompressed urgently. 
  • Functional impairment and decreased motility of the GI tract can lead to acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, or Ogilvie syndrome i.e. functional obstruction of the GI tract. This is more commonly seen in elderly and debilitated patients. Treatment is conservative medical management. Neostigmine can be very effective but requires careful monitoring due to potential of bradycardia. 


Constipation


  • May be associated with fecal impaction and fecal incontinence. Fecal impaction can cause mucosal ulceration, bleeding, and anemia. 
  • Often caused by Medications, comorbidities, inactivity, and decreased gastric-emptying time and GI malignancies 
  • Perform a rectal examination should be performed on all patients with constipation to rule out mechanical obstruction of stool.
  • Treat chronic constipation with dietary and activity changes, followed by bulk laxatives and warm water enema


Malignancy


  • Ask for h/o unintentional weight loss, night sweats, and fatigue, hematuria, hematochezia. 
  • May also present with peritonitis, ascites, perforation, obstruction, or abdominal mass

Appendicitis
  • Difficult to diagnose in elderly patient and missed in more than 50% cases. The classic presentation is rarely seen. Literature now supports the use of non-contrast CT imaging for suspected appendicitis.
  • Elderly have a higher risk for mortality and morbidity following appendectomy. 


Extra-Abdominal Causes


  • Congestive heart failure
  • Acute Coronary Syndromes
  • Pneumonia, Pulmonary embolism
  • Prostatitis 
  • Urinary retention/infection (antihistamines, anticholinergics, technical obstruction, Pyelonephritis)
  • Herpes zoster involving thoracic dermatomes 
  • Rectus sheath hepatomas if they are on anticoagulants

Take Home

  • Think of Vascular causes of pain abdomen in elderly (AAA, Dissection, Bowel Ischemia)
  • GB disease (Cholecystitis, Cholangitis, Pancreatitis) and Bowel Obstruction are common in geriatric population
  • Do a rectal exam to assess prostate, look for blood/malena
  • Do a broad work up including lab tests and have a low threshold for imaging and admission for observation


Further Raeding: 
Leuthauser A, McVane B. Abdominal pain in the geriatric patient. Emergency Medicine Clinics. 2016 May 1;34(2):363-75.


Posted by:

              
     Lakshay Chanana
     
     Speciality Doctor
     Northwick Park Hospital
     Department of Emergency Medicine
     England

     @EMDidactic


Monday, October 3, 2016

Is Acute Appendicitis always a CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS?


RLQ pain is quite a common presentation in the ED. We always think and rule out appendicitis first. So this week, let's go through a few questions that popped into my mind while evaluating a RLQ/RIF pain. To begin with, I was always taught that appendix is a vestigial organ but recent literature on biofilms suggests that appendix may act as a storehouse for commensal microorganisms that defend us against pathogens.

So what actually causes Appendicitis?
Mostly, appendicitis is caused as a result of an acute obstruction of the appendiceal lumen due to an appendicolith, calculus, tumor, parasite, or an enlarged lymph node. This leads to a rise in intraluminal pressures and accumulation of mucosal secretions. The resulting distention stimulates visceral afferent pathways perceived as a dull, poorly localized pain. Ulceration and ischemia develop as the intraluminal pressure exceeds the venous pressure. Gradually, the appendix becomes swollen, and factors elaborated in the pathologic process begin to irritate surrounding structures, including the peritoneal wall leading to more localized pain. If swelling does not terminate, gangrene or perforation occurs.



What causes this migration of pain from peri-umblical area to RIF?
Afferent fibers, which conduct visceral pain from the appendix, accompany the sympathetic nerves and enter the spinal cord at T10 segment. This causes an early referred of pain to the umbilical area that later migrates to RIF.

The classic appendicitis – a clinical diagnosis
Vague onset of dull periumbilical pain with low-grade fever, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Pain then migrates to the RIF. This presentation does not require imaging which is why we were taught that "Appendicitis is a clinical diagnosis." It can be hard to distinguish OBGYN pathology from Appendicitis in females, so have a low threshold to obtain imaging for them. 
Atypical symptoms: Increased urinary frequency and the desire to defecate.
  • Retrocecal or Retroiliac Appendix: Pain may be dulled by overlying bowel.  Isolated rectal tenderness rarely may be the only site of localized pain in patients with a low-lying or retrocecal appendix.
  • Elongated Appendix: Pain may be referred to the flank, pelvis, or RUQ. 
Physical Exam:  Localized RLQ abdominal tenderness. The pain may be noted over McBurney’s point (but not always). Abdominal guarding and Rigidity to palpation (may not be seen in elderly due to less muscle mass). Rebound tenderness is a late finding which may be absent early in the course. (Elicit this only once, this can be extremely painful)
  • Rovsing sign - Tenderness is referred to the RLQ with palpation of the LLQ. 
  • Psoas sign – Increased pain on hip extension (due to stretching of Psoas) 
  • Obturator sign Pain on hip flexion external rotation
In addition, pain on coughing suggests acute peritonitis and a lack of worsening pain with cough make appendicitis less likely.
Here is a table with mimics of appendicitis:


Do they always have a low-grade fever?
No. Vitals can be normal in the beginning. However, a low-grade fever is present only in about 15% of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis; and in up to 40% if perforation has occurred.

Who is at the risk of perforation?
Patients may be more prone to earlier perforation because of anatomic changes in the appendix associated with aging, such as a narrowed appendiceal lumen, thinner mucosal lining, decreased lymphoid tissue, and atherosclerosis. It usually occurs within 24 to 36 hours. Perforation is more commonly seen at the extremes of ages.

How do we evaluate a pregnant female with suspected appendicitis?
  • Diagnosing appendicitis in females is a challenge regardless of the conception status. Therefore, use of imaging should be strongly considered in any female with RLQ pain. Nausea and vomiting occur normally in a pregnancy, and the accuracy of the physical exam is compromised because of altered anatomy. Lab values are not useful, because leukocytosis is common during pregnancy.


  • Maternal death from appendicitis is extremely rare, spontaneous fetal abortion occurs in up to 15-37% cases. Start with a USG, then MRI if USG is indeterminate. A shielded CT should only be the last resort. If there are potential delays in obtaining imaging, admit them for serial abdominal exams.

ED Management
  • NPO
  • Analgesia: There is robust literature that proves that opioids do not mask physical exam findings or interfere with surgical decision making. If your surgical colleagues like to examine patients prior to that then give them a call the moment you suspect appendicitis and make sure that they put their hand on the patient’s belly within the next few minutes.
  • IVF
  • Antiemetics
  • Antibiotics 

Equivocal Imaging. Can we send them home with red flags?
  • Educate your patients about worsening signs of appendicitis, along with arrangements for immediate re-evaluation if their symptoms worsen, or call them for an abdominal re-examination in 12-24 hours. Document this discussion in the patient’s record.
  • Consider admission for those  who require significant doses of opiates to control their pain, who cannot follow-up, if patient or family reliability is in question.



Is it possible to have acute appendicitis with a NORMAL Leukocyte Count
  • Yes, it is certainly possible to have appendicitis despite having a normal WCC although many surgeons believe otherwise. Approximately 80 to 90% of patients with acute appendicitis will have an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count above 10,000/mm. Unfortunately, the leukocyte count is nonspecific and often is elevated with other causes of abdominal pain. 
  • Other labs: Mild sterile pyuria may be seen if the appendix is irritating the ureter but significant pyuria (i.e. > 20 WBCs/ HPF) is highly suggestive of urinary tract pathology.
  • Use scoring systems such as “MANTRELS score” cautiously especially with female patients. 


Imaging Appendicitis - USG or CT scan?
USG: On ultrasound, a non-compressible appendix with a diameter greater than 6 to 7 mm is considered diagnostic for appendicitis. Ultrasonography is inexpensive, requires no exposure to radiation, adds no extra time for contrast administration, and is also useful in diagnosing OBGYN pathology in women.
A negative ultrasound scan with a concerning story and symptomatic patient warrants either in-hospital observation or a CT scan. i.e. a negative USG cannot rule out appendicitis in a patient with concerning history and physical exam.








CT scan: Even if you start with a CT scan, let me tell you that a CT is not 100% accurate as well. Care should be taken not to label minor changes in appendix as “negative,” because 1/3 of patients with such equivocal findings eventually have histologic confirmation of appendicitis.
Having a final word with them is crucial: If the CT appears truly negative, still you need to explain them explicitly about when to return for reevaluation if symptoms worsen or do not resolve in the next 24hrs. Such information and follow-up is important in patients evaluated within the first few hours of symptoms, as early appendicitis may be missed on the CT scan. 

Do all of them require surgery?
The Appendicitis Acuta (APPAC) trial compared "antibiotic therapy" with "appendectomy" in the treatment of 530 patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by CT. The trial did not demonstrate noninferiority of antimicrobial management versus surgery.

However, currenlty nonsurgical treatment can be considered only when appendectomy is not accessible. Anecdotal reports describe the success of IV antibiotics in treating acute appendicitis in patients without access to surgical intervention. About 1/3 of non surgically treated patients are likely to have a recurrent episode of appendicitis within 14 months.


Take Home:

  • Pain Relief always comes first.
  • A normal white cell count, a negative USG or even a negative CT cannot rule out appendicitis in a patient with concerning story and physical exam. Therefore, whenever sending them home, discuss reg flags and document that in the patient's chart.
  • Pregnancy with RLQ pain, start with USG and then MRI scan if needed. A shielded CT should only be your last option here.
  • Have a low threshold to obtain imaging in every female with RLQ pain because appendicitis is "not always" a clinical diagnosis. 




Author:

              
     Lakshay Chanana
     
     Speciality Doctor
     Northwick Park Hospital
     Department of Emergency Medicine
     England

     @EMDidactic
                                                        






Monday, September 19, 2016

The Deadly Mesenteric Ischemia - TIME IS BOWEL !!


Mesenteric ischemia (MI) is a frightful pathology due to its variable presentations, time‐ sensitive nature, and high morbidity and mortality. It is quite a rare disease; and as Emergency Physicians we are likely to encounter only a few cases of it in our entire careers. As a consequence of that, it gives a hard time to even the most senior physicians to diagnose mesenteric ischemia. Ischemic bowel can progress to infarction within a matter of hours which gives us a very short window to make the diagnosis. Moreover, Emergency Physicians may be the only early healthcare providers who see these patients within such a narrow time‐frame, which makes it pivotal for us to know about this entity. 
Lets look at some key questions regarding Mesenteric Ischemia.

What is Mesenteric Ischemia?

Mesenteric ischemia not a single disease, it is actually group of related disorders, including Acute Occlusions of mesenteric vessels from embolus, thrombosis or dissection, and volvulus; Chronic schema arising from mesenteric atherosclerosis (like Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Vascular disease) ; Ischemic colitis from low‐flow hemodynamic states (hypotension due to sepsis, dialysis, aortic surgery, congestive heart failure); and Portal Vein thrombosis (pregnancy and other prothrombotic states).

Relevant Anatomy
The major mesenteric branches of the abdominal aorta are:
  1. Celiac artery
  2. Superior mesenteric artery (SMA)
  3. Inferior mesenteric artery (IMA)
The main vessel draining the bowel is the portal vein (PV). When blood flow through these vessels is compromised, ischemic complications can occur. SMA is of particular concern because it supplies almost the complete small bowel and about two-thirds of large bowel. IMA occlusion can infarct the distal colon, leading to perforation/ sepsis. PV restricts venous drainage of the bowel, in extreme cases leading to ischemia by preventing arterial inflow.


What can cause Mesenteric Ischemia?


1.   External compression - Mass lesions
2.   From internal obstruction - Embolus, Thrombus, or Arterial dissection, PV thrombosis
3.   Volvulus of the mesentery and blood supply - Volvulus with occlusion blood vessels
4.   Compression of obstructed bowel segments by adhesions, and by global hypoperfusion states - Non-Occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia

           Consequences of a vascular occlusion also depend on the rate and the exact point of occlusion. 
  • Acute Occlusions (like unstable cardiac angina) are more likely to result in end‐organ ischemia, due to lack of time for the development of collaterals. 
  • Chronically Ischemia  (like stable cardiac angina, AKA intestinal angina) may develop collateral blood supplies that limit end‐organ schema. You may get a history of post-prandial pain and an aversion to eating leading to loss of weight.
  • Distal Occlusions of smaller vessels injure shorter segments of bowel as compared with proximal occlusions, and collateral networks may be enough to prevent frank infarction. 

What is the “CLASSIC” presentation of Mesenteric Ischemia?
Acute Abdominal pain, Pain which out of proportion to examination in an elderly patient, H/O Atrial fibrillation ++ 
Diagnosis - Acute embolic occlusion of SMA. Labs show an elevated lactate and leukocytosis.
Classic presentations are not always seen: Patients may not always have Atrial Fibrillation (in situ thrombosis can occur) and may not have pain that is out of proportion to examination. 
Elevation of lactate is common and sensitive but nonspecific i.e. Lactate can be elevated in a number of other conditions as well. Additionally, a normal lactate may be encountered early in the course of ischemia before the beginning of infarction. The bottom-line is that an elevated lactate level should raise suspicion of mesenteric schema. High lactate suggests BOWEL NECROSIS. 
Leukocytosis often raises concerns about appendicitis, cholecystitis, or diverticulitis rather than mesenteric ischemia. A high WBC count is again nonspecific i.e. it can be elevated in a number of other conditions. But it is commonly seen with mesenteric 
ischemia and should not be attributed solely to "stress response". In contrast, a falling white 
blood cell count is a worrying prognostic sign. 


Utility of Vital Signs in Mesenteric Ischemia?
Many of these patients may have normal vital signs leading to lower acuity triage which may cause physicians to be falsely reassured about the patient’s stability. Like Acute Coronary Syndromes, Strokes and many other ischemic diseases, MI often presents with a normal set of vitals.

Age:  Does this only affect elderly?
No, MI may also be seen in young patients without known comorbidities, although this is rare but not impossible. Persistent Pain out of proportion to exam, leucocytosis, high lactate should make you think about MI. Once you suspect this diagnosis, chase it promptly because the dictum here is “TIME IS BOWEL”.

What imaging do we need to get for suspected Mesenteric Ischemia?
AXR – Abdominal films rarely show some key findings such as intramural pneumatosis intestinalis or portal venous gas, making x‐rays unhelpful in diagnosing MI. More often, the AXR gives a false sense of reassurance. So if you are suspecting MI, avoid AXR as it can introduce diagnostic delay and if you happen to do an AXR, consider MI a possible diagnosis regardless of x‐ray findings.
          CT - Oral Contrast in not required. The use of oral contrast is associated with unnecessary delay. Tell the Radiologist what you want them to look for specifically.
      CT findings: Occlusion of mesenteric blood vessels, as well as for secondary findings of mesenteric ischemia including bowel wall thickening, pneumatosis, abdominal free fluid, mesenteric fat stranding, and pneumoperitoneum.

Pneumatosis intestinal i.e. refers to gas within the wall of the bowel.on
Acute SMA occlusion
                                              
The sensitivity of CT may also vary depending on the degree of ischemia and the time lapsed from symptom onset to performance of CT. In patients with significant concern for ischemia, a negative CT should be viewed suspiciously.

Non‐contrast CT cannot demonstrate vascular filling defects. However, it may show secondary CT findings such as bowel wall thickening, free fluid, free air, and fat stranding. Therefore,  a normal non‐contrast CT scan does not rule out mesenteric ischemia. 


      Bottom-line with CT: Oral contrast administration is unnecessary for the diagnosis of mesenteric schema, use CT with IV contrast. If IV contrast cannot be safely administered due to renal dysfunction, then request for a CT 
without oral or IV contrast which may reveal a range of important findings including pneumoperitoneum, small bowel obstruction, free fluid, fat stranding, other inflammatory processes (appendicitis, diverticulitis) or abdominal aortic aneurysm.

How do we treat mesenteric Ischemia?
  •           Pain Relief
  •           IV Fluids
  •           NG Tube for gut decompression, Foleys Catheterisation  
  •           Broad Spectrum Antibiotics
  •           Correct Electrolyte Abnormalities
  •           Vasopressors (Can exacerbate Ischemia)
  •           Anticoagulants (inhibits further thrombogenesis)
  •           Surgical embolectomy with resection of infarcted bowel OR Intra‐arterial thrombolytic therapy. 
Time until surgery is an important prognostic factor. Surgery permits visual inspection of bowel for ischemia or infarction, and may pick up findings which were missed by CT. 

Key Points:
  • Whenever you suspect Mesenteric Ischemia, do not dilly-dally – Do a quick assessment and come up with a plan. Get senior help early enough. Involve your Surgical colleagues and Radiologists ASAP.
  • Start suspecting MI despite normal vital signs and laboratory values. Do not overly on White cell count and lactate. Remember, Nothing is 100% in Medicine!
  • X-rays and CT with oral contrast rarely provide any useful information. Use CT with IV contrast in those patients with normal renal function to pick vascular filling defects. 

References:
  • Lange H, Jackel R. Usefulness of plasma lactate concentration in the diagnosis of acute abdominal disease. Eur J Surg 1994;160:3814.
  • Smerud MJ, Johnson CD, Stephens DH. Diagnosis of bowel infarction: a comparison of plain films and CT scans in 23 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:99103. 
  • Kirkpatrick ID, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM. Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:918.
  • Zandrino F, Musante F, Gallesio I, Benzi L. Assessment of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: multislice computed tomography signs and clinical performance in a group of patients with surgical correlation. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2006;52:31725.
  • Urban BA, Fishman EK. Tailored helical CT evaluation of acute abdomen. Radiographics 2000;20:72549.
  • Balthazar EJ, Hulnick D, Megibow AJ, Opulencia JF. Computed tomography of intramural intestinal hemorrhage and bowel ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:6772. 
  • De Filippo M, Sagone C, Zompatori M. Unenhanced MDCT findings of acute bowel ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W271.
  • De Filippo M, Sverzellati N, Zompatori M. Unenhanced CT in patients with chronic renal failure with clinical suspicion of smallbowel infarct. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:W266.
  • Kim AY. Reply to "Unenhanced MDCT findings of acute bowel ischemia". AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W383.
  • Pear BL. Pneumatosis intestinalis: a review. Radiology 1998;207:139. 

  • Image1 - http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1892253-overview
  • Image2 - Case courtesy of Dr N Sravani, <a href="http://radiopaedia.org/">Radiopaedia.org</a>. From the case <a href="http://radiopaedia.org/cases/46946">rID: 46946</a>
  • Image3 - Case courtesy of Dr Abdallah Khateeb , < a href="http://radiopaedia.org/">Radiopaedia.org</a>. From the case <a href="http://radiopaedia.org/cases/43593">rID: 43593</a>
Author:

              
     Lakshay Chanana
     
     Speciality Doctor
     Northwick Park Hospital
     Department of Emergency Medicine
     England

     @EMDidactic